Tag

alternative lenders

4 insights

Bullet-chart cover comparing operated collection to a traditional desk: operated recovers about 50% against a 20 to 30% traditional benchmark, at 60 to 80% lower cost per dollar recovered, roughly 2 to 4 times the recovery.

The Collections Desk That Scaled With the Book Was the Wrong One

Two lenders, one book size, two collections cost structures. Why a manual desk scales with headcount while an operated cadence holds cost flat as the book grows.
View Insight
Grouped bar chart showing 42% of finance work is fully automatable and 19% is mostly automatable with current technology, a combined 61% ceiling reachable only at the function level.

Automating Tasks Is Not Automating a Function. Most Lenders Have Confused the Two.

Most lenders have automated tasks, not functions. The 2026 data shows why that gap keeps the cost in place, and what automating a full function actually requires.
View Insight
Statement graphic showing a 60 to 90 percent cycle-time reduction when a lending workflow is redesigned end to end, versus a 15 to 20 percent net gain when AI is bolted onto the existing process.

Bolt It On, or Redesign Around It: Why Your 2025 AI Purchase Underdelivered

Most lenders blame the technology when their AI underdelivers. The real issue is a point tool bolted onto an unchanged process. See why end-to-end redesign drives 60 to 90 percent cycle-time reductions.
View Insight
Bar chart showing agentic workflows cut per-loan processing cost 35 to 50 percent versus human-assisted AI

The Exception Queue Is the Most Expensive Line in Your Loan Operation

Agentic workflows cut per-loan processing cost 35 to 50% by eliminating the exception queue scripted automation creates. Here is the math most lenders never run.
View Insight

Start with the process that costs you most.

A conversation first. A structured assessment when it earns one. Or see what a discovery finds before you book anything.

Book a discovery call See what a discovery finds